At one point, Minetti says:
‘if you really think about tragedy
with a clear head
you can see at heart it's really comedy
and vice versa’
This absurdist paradox – tragedy is comedy and comedy is tragedy – recurs throughout Bernhard’s novels and plays and ultimately comes from Arthur Schopenhauer, one of the intellectual and artistic shadows – like Ludwig Wittgenstein, Paul Wittgenstein and Glenn Gould – always cropping up in Bernhard’s work. In The World as Will and Representation, the German philosopher writes:
‘The life of every individual, if we survey it as a whole and in general, and only lay stress upon its most significant features, is really always a tragedy, but gone through in detail, it has the character of a comedy. For the deeds and vexations of the day, the restless irritation of the moment, the desires and fears of the week, the mishaps of every hour, are all through chance, which is ever bent upon some jest, scenes of a comedy. But the never-satisfied wishes, the frustrated efforts, the hopes unmercifully crushed by fate, the unfortunate errors of the whole life, with increasing suffering and death at the end, are always a tragedy. Thus, as if fate would add derision to the misery of our existence, our life must contain all the woes of tragedy, and yet we cannot even assert the dignity of tragic characters, but in the broad detail of life must inevitably be the foolish characters of a comedy.’